The legal guidelines round cell phone use whereas driving are to be tightened beneath new UK authorities plans to make any use of a hand-held cellphone unlawful. From 2022, cell phone regulation shall be prolonged to cowl taking pictures or movies, scrolling via playlists or enjoying video games whereas driving or stationary, say, at a site visitors gentle. Use of a cell phone ‘hands-free’, nevertheless, will nonetheless be allowed—despite the fact that analysis exhibits it’s equally distracting.
At the moment, UK drivers utilizing a hand-held cell phone can solely be prosecuted if it may be confirmed that they have been utilizing it for an “interactive communicative operate” comparable to calling or texting. The change within the regulation closes this loophole, and makes it simpler for distracted drivers to be prosecuted, fined £200, and given six factors on their licence.
In response to the UK authorities, 81% of people that responded to its session supported the transfer. This aligns with findings from roadside breakdown group RAC, whose annual report on motoring frequently exhibits that cell phone use by different drivers is a prime concern for motorists.
However knowledge additionally exhibits that many drivers who declare to assist the regulation however proceed to make use of their telephones whereas behind the wheel. One survey discovered that greater than 1 / 4 of drivers admitted to hand-held cell phone use, at the least sometimes.
So why do drivers who assist the regulation, and acknowledge the hazards of distracted driving, nonetheless use their telephones? The reply partly lies in driver attitudes and biases.
What the proof tells us
Analysis constantly exhibits that almost all drivers contemplate themselves to be above common at driving. Statistically talking, in fact, that is extremely unlikely. However this “self-enhancement bias” offers drivers a rationale for believing their cell phone use is secure, whereas condemning others for doing the identical factor.
Telephone-using drivers justify their behaviour by claiming they can modify their cell phone use depending on the driving state of affairs, comparable to limiting use on busy roads. They imagine they can multitask and mitigate the chance in a means that different drivers can’t.
Drivers with self-enhancement bias additionally usually exhibit “crash threat optimism”—judging themselves to be at decrease threat of a crash in comparison with different drivers.
In a way, each journey a self-perceived above-average driver efficiently completes whereas utilizing a cell phone seems to substantiate to them that their behaviour is acceptable, and the regulation is geared toward different drivers. This helps to clarify why robust assist for a tightened regulation on this space can coexist with excessive charges of offending.
Training campaigns that, for instance, function deadly or critical collisions brought on by a distracted driver can truly play into these biases. Such campaigns seem to substantiate drivers’ perception that they’ll deal with it, whereas these different “inferior” drivers couldn’t.
For these over-confident drivers, maybe the one deterrent could be the specter of enforcement. However lately, numbers of devoted roads-policing officers within the UK have declined, and the general public has, apparently, seen. In a single survey, 54% of respondents felt they have been unlikely to be caught or punished for utilizing a hand-held cell phone whereas driving.
This mixture of circumstances makes it very troublesome to steer drivers that they should not use their cell phones behind the wheel. If a driver thinks they’ll safely multitask whereas additionally avoiding prosecution, what’s stopping them?
We have to change attitudes
The tightening of the regulation could assist to encourage some drivers to consider their cellphone use, nevertheless it appears unlikely it would remedy the issue of cell phone use amongst drivers, and eradicate the hurt it causes.
In a broader sense, adjustments to the regulation won’t ever be capable of hold tempo with new applied sciences. In-vehicle distractions, comparable to interactive screens on the dashboard and digital assistants like Alexa, are creating extra rapidly than the regulation can sustain with.
If we need to cut back the variety of individuals killed and severely injured annually by drivers utilizing their cell phones, we’ve got to steer drivers to not do it no matter whether or not or not they’re going to get caught.
We have to problem the narratives that drivers frequently deploy to justify their behaviour, and tackle driver biases head-on by offering training, based mostly on psychological proof, that is more durable for drivers to withstand or deny. Interactive training, which permits drivers to expertise their very own distraction, relatively than listening to concerning the failures of others, could be a great place to begin.
If we do not tackle driver attitudes, we cannot meaningfully tackle driver distraction, no matter what the regulation says.
Why some drivers decelerate when utilizing cell phones
This text is republished from The Dialog beneath a Artistic Commons license. Learn the unique article.
Drivers and hand-held cell phones: Extending the ban will not remedy the issue – here is why (2021, November 26)
retrieved 27 November 2021
This doc is topic to copyright. Other than any honest dealing for the aim of personal examine or analysis, no
half could also be reproduced with out the written permission. The content material is offered for info functions solely.